phc2sys: Fix lower bound value of update_rate
Following command produces unexpected update rate. # phc2sys -s eth0 -q -m -O0 -R1.0842021724855044e-19 This is caused by wrong validation of phc_interval related to significant digits of double precision and phc_interval_tp.tv_sec overflow. To avoid these unwanted trouble, this patch limits lower bound of phc_rate to 1e-9. There is no profound meaning in the lower bound value. I just think it's enough to actual use and it doesn't cause phc_interval_tp.tv_sec overflow in not only 64bit environment but also 32bit environment. Thereby, messy validation of phc_interval is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Ken ICHIKAWA <ichikawa.ken@jp.fujitsu.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									5bf265e860
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b943ea2fba
					
				
							
								
								
									
										10
									
								
								phc2sys.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										10
									
								
								phc2sys.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							@ -634,17 +634,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 | 
			
		||||
				return -1;
 | 
			
		||||
			break;
 | 
			
		||||
		case 'R':
 | 
			
		||||
			if (get_arg_val_d(c, optarg, &phc_rate, 0.0, DBL_MAX))
 | 
			
		||||
			if (get_arg_val_d(c, optarg, &phc_rate, 1e-9, DBL_MAX))
 | 
			
		||||
				return -1;
 | 
			
		||||
			phc_interval = 1.0 / phc_rate;
 | 
			
		||||
			/* phc_interval will be assigned to a time_t variable. */
 | 
			
		||||
			/* check if that occurs overflow. */
 | 
			
		||||
			if ((sizeof(time_t) == 8 && phc_interval > INT64_MAX) ||
 | 
			
		||||
			    (sizeof(time_t) == 4 && phc_interval > INT32_MAX)) {
 | 
			
		||||
				fprintf(stderr,
 | 
			
		||||
					"-R: %s is too small\n", optarg);
 | 
			
		||||
				return -1;
 | 
			
		||||
			}
 | 
			
		||||
			break;
 | 
			
		||||
		case 'N':
 | 
			
		||||
			if (get_arg_val_i(c, optarg, &phc_readings, 1, INT_MAX))
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user