From 2fd7a1c18ff1aadff636cdc0b7ac1ef6460bc954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:53:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use the correct slave-only clock class.

If we are going to be slave-only, then we should also advertise the
correct clock class.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
---
 linuxptp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/linuxptp.c b/linuxptp.c
index a350261..e1ae964 100644
--- a/linuxptp.c
+++ b/linuxptp.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	ds.slaveOnly = TRUE; // TODO - make this programmable.
 	ds.priority1 = 128;
-	ds.clockQuality.clockClass = 248;
+	ds.clockQuality.clockClass = 255;
 	ds.clockQuality.clockAccuracy = 0xfe;
 	ds.clockQuality.offsetScaledLogVariance = 0xffff;
 	ds.priority2 = 128;